Is there a quote that expresses Mill’s opposition to Indian democracy?

What JS Mill said about democracy?

Mill’s idea is that only if a democratic society follows the Principle of Liberty can its political and social institutions fulfill their role of shaping national character so that its citizens can realise the permanent interests of people as progressive beings (Rawls, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy; p …

What was Mill’s famous quote?

Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.” “A person may cause evil to others not only by his actions but by his inaction, and in either case he is justly accountable to them for the injury.”

What does Mill say about tyranny of the majority?

In Mill’s view, tyranny of the majority is worse than tyranny of government because it is not limited to a political function.

What does Mill have to say to those who believe that society has a duty to protect individuals from harming themselves?

Summary. In this chapter, Mill attempts to delineate when the authority of society can rightly limit individuality and the “sovereignty of the individual over himself.” Mill’s answer is that society and the individual should each receive control over that part of human life that it is particularly interested in.

What did John Stuart Mill argue?

Mill argued a utilitarian case for the liberty of thought and discussion. Mill’s utilitarian case for the liberty of thought and discussion was a forceful one. He asserted that the problem with any effort to suppress nonconforming viewpoints is that the guardians of orthodoxy wrongfully presume their own infallibility.

What did John Stuart Mill advocate for?

A liberal classical economist, Mill was an advocate of individual rights, progressive social policies, and utilitarianism (which promotes actions that do “the greatest good for the greatest number”).

Which of the following quotes is attributed to John Stuart Mill?

“A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.”

Who said push pin is as good as poetry?

Jeremy Bentham

Push-pin was immortalized by Jeremy Bentham when he wrote in The Rationale of Reward that: “Prejudice apart, the game of push-pin is of equal value with the arts and sciences of music and poetry.” John Stuart Mill, who disagreed with Bentham on this point, misquotes Bentham as saying, “Push-pin is as good as poetry.” …

Is John Stuart Mill a utilitarian?

The Classical Utilitarians, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, identified the good with pleasure, so, like Epicurus, were hedonists about value. They also held that we ought to maximize the good, that is, bring about ‘the greatest amount of good for the greatest number’.

Is John Stuart Mill a liberal?

John Stuart Mill (1806–73) was the most influential English language philosopher of the nineteenth century. He was a naturalist, a utilitarian, and a liberal, whose work explores the consequences of a thoroughgoing empiricist outlook.

How does Mill respond to the accusation that utilitarianism is a swinish doctrine?

Mill’s Utilitarianism was accused of being a “swinish doctrine” since it only appeals to pleasure. Mill counters that this would only be the case if we imagined humans capable only of swinish pleasures. But humans can experience more that those, and these latter are superior.

How did John Stuart Mill contribute to liberalism?

John Stuart Mill dominated liberal thought during the nineteenth century with insights offered into the harm principle, free will, the despotism of custom, experiments in living, utilitarianism, the marketplace of ideas and electoral reform.

Did John Stuart Mill believe God?

In this sense, Mill would endorse a Religion of Humanity, which does not compromise our intellectual faculties and does not require us to believe in the supernatural. This is a defence of his own secular faith, the Religion of Humanity, that could perhaps be termed a non-religious religion.

What utilitarianism means?

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong by focusing on outcomes. It is a form of consequentialism. Utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number.

Is utilitarianism a philosophy?

Understanding Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism is a tradition of ethical philosophy that is associated with Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, two late 18th- and 19th-century British philosophers, economists, and political thinkers.

What is the difference between Bentham and Mill’s version of utilitarianism?

What are the main differences between Bentham and Mill’s utilitarianism and which theory is better? Both thought that the moral value of an act was determined by the pleasure it produced. Bentham considered only quantity of pleasure, but Mill considered both quantity and quality of pleasure.

What does John Stuart Mill say about utilitarianism?

Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” Mill defines happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain.

What’s the opposite of utilitarianism?

What is Deontology? Deontology is exactly the opposite of utilitarianism when it comes to the explanations of its concepts. Deontology does not believe in the concept of ‘the end justifies the means’.

What are the essential differences between John Stuart Mill’s version of utilitarianism and Immanuel Kant’s deontology?

The main difference between Kantianism and Utilitarianism is that Kantianism is a deontological moral theory whereas utilitarianism is a teleological moral theory. Both Kantianism and utilitarianism are ethical theories that express the ethical standard of an action.

How are Mill and Kant similar?

Kant and Mill are similar in multiple ways where both recognize the moral rules where Kant calls them duties and Mill calls them subordinate principles. Both have the subordinate principles where not to lie, no to stealing, and deprive from liberty from others.

Why does Kant disagree with utilitarianism?

Whatever produces the most happiness in the most people is the moral course of action. Kant has an insightful objection to moral evaluations of this sort. The essence of the objection is that utilitarian theories actually devalue the individuals it is supposed to benefit.

Which is better utilitarianism or Kantianism?

It is easier to determine an action as morally right in Kantian ethics than in utilitarian ethics. When data is scarce, Kantian theory offers more precision than utilitarianism because one can generally determine if somebody is being used as a mere means, even if the impact on human happiness is ambiguous.

What does Mill mean when he claims that motives have nothing to do with the morality of an action?

(cf Railton, 1982 for good discussion.) Motives as criterion for rightness/wrongness: Acc to Mill (and utilitarians in general) the agent’s motives are irrelevant to the rightness or wrongness of his actions. Thus, ‘the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action, though much with the worth of the agent.

Is Kant a libertarian?

Kant: Immanuel Kant was a Libertarian about free will.

Like Descartes, he too believed that the world (at least, the one that we perceive) was completely determined—and yet, we are free (or, we might be).

What does Kant and Nozick agree on?

Nozick takes his position to follow from a basic moral principle associated with Immanuel Kant and enshrined in Kant’s second formulation of his famous Categorical Imperative: “Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.” The idea here is …

What is the libertarian philosophy?

Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and political freedom, and minimize the state’s violation of individual liberties; emphasizing free association, freedom of choice, individualism and voluntary association.

What is the basis of morality according to Kant?

Kant holds that if there is a fundamental law of morality, it is a categorical imperative. Taking the fundamental principle of morality to be a categorical imperative implies that moral reasons override other sorts of reasons. You might, for instance, think you have a self interested reason to cheat on exam.

What is Kant’s phrase for the highest good?

Kant understands the highest good, most basically, as happiness proportionate to virtue, where virtue is the unconditioned good and happiness is the conditioned good.

What are some problems with Kantian ethics?

The most common and general criticisms are that, because it concentrates on principles or rules, Kantian ethics is doomed to be either empty and formalistic or rigidly uniform in its prescriptions (the complaints cannot both be true).

What is Kantian theory in simple terms?

Kant’s ethics are organized around the notion of a “categorical imperative,” which is a universal ethical principle stating that one should always respect the humanity in others, and that one should only act in accordance with rules that could hold for everyone.

Does Kant believe God?

In a work published the year he died, Kant analyzes the core of his theological doctrine into three articles of faith: (1) he believes in one God, who is the causal source of all good in the world; (2) he believes in the possibility of harmonizing God’s purposes with our greatest good; and (3) he believes in human …

What is Kant’s universal law?

One of Kant’s categorical imperatives is the universalizability principle, in which one should “act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law.” In lay terms, this simply means that if you do an action, then everyone else should also be able to do it.